Bundles - How to Create a Trial Bundle


IMPORTANT This information page is designed to be used by clients of John Antell who are to be represented by him at a civil trial in a court or tribunal. It is intended to be used only by clients who have entered into an agreement for the provision of legal services by John Antell and only in conjunction with specific advice to the individual client about their individual case. This information page should not be used by, or relied on, by anyone else. If you are not currently a client of John Antell you may want to obtain a quotation for representation at a forthcoming trial.




What is a Trial Bundle?


When there is a trial in a civil court or tribunal, the court/tribunal will refer to documents arranged in a Trial Bundle which is produced by one of the parties - usually the party bring the proceedings who, depending on the court/tribunal, may be called the Claimant or Applicant. In a Trial Bundle every page has a page number and the judge and each party at the hearing have identical copies of the Trial Bundle (if it is a tribunal with more than one judge or a judge and lay assessors/tribunal members then each will need a copy). There will be a further copy of the Trial Bundle in the witness box. When a witness is asked to look at a particular page in the copy of the bundle in the witness box, the parties and the judge can easily and quickly refer to the same page in their bundles. 

As well as being paginated - having each page numbered consecutively - the Trial Bundle will have an Index at the front. Despite its name, the Index is not like the index of an ordinary book. An ordinary non-fiction book will have a table of contents at the front listing each section or chapter in the order it appears with the page number, and there will also be an index at the back listing alphabetically people, places, topics etc. with the page number where that person, place, or topic is referred to in the book. The Index of a Trial Bundle is not at all like an alphabetic index that you find at the end of a typical book. It is at the front and is really a table of contents, but is more detailed than the table of contents in the average book because it lists every document, not merely every section, in the Trial Bundle, with its page number. Why is it called an Index? The word Index is actually an old word for a table of contents, rarely used in this sense now outside the legal context, but this is still its primary meaning when used by lawyers and judges.

Typical arrangement of sections in a Trial Bundle

It is usual to arrange a Trial Bundle in the following sections:

The Index at the front will list every document in the Trial Bundle, giving the date of the document, a brief description, and the page number. The purpose of the Index is, of course, to enable judges and lawyers to quickly find a document they are looking for, but, because the index is large, it is also important that the documents are arranged in the bundle in logical order so that the index (which, of course, lists them in the same order) is easy to use - i.e. it should be possible to guess roughly where a document is likely to appear in the index so that, in most instances, it is not necessary to search all the way though a long index. 

Pleadings - otherwise known as "statements of case".  These are the documents drafted by each party's barrister which set out concisely, and often in a technical legal manner, what each party alleges. In different type of tribunal or court case the pleadings may have different names such as Claim Form, Particulars of Claim, Defence and Counterclaim, etc. or simply Claimant's Statement of Case. These would generally be in chronological order within this section.

Orders. These are written decisions made by the court/tribunal about how the parties are to prepare for the hearing, for example whether a party may use an expert report, and by what date documents and witness statements are to be provided by one party to another. Orders would be in chronological order within this section.

NOTICES for VIDEOS and AUDIO files. This section name is in CAPITALs to draw attention to the fact that, in addition to the pages in the bundle itself, there is video/audio evidence. Where video and/or audio files are to be used at trial, normally a formal Notice has to be served by the party relying on them, and such Notices are stored in this section. If formal Notices are not required to be served, then a note should be stored in this section listing the audio and video files and stating where they are - e.g. on a USB Drive in a plastic pocket on the following page.  

Other Notices about Evidence. Any other Notices about evidence which have been served - for example a Notice where a party does not admit the authenticity of a document the other party wishes to rely on. 

Witness Statements. These are not arranged chronologically but rather the witness statements of the Claimant's witnesses (usually the Claimant's own statement first and then the Claimant's other witnesses in alphabetical order of witness name or some other convenient order) are together, followed by the witness statements of the Defendant's witnesses. If there are two or more witness statements from the same witness to be included in the trial bundle they should appear one after the other, the earlier one first. 

Photographs. Photographs, generally in chronological order. 

Within this section duplication should be avoided so if, for example, there is a photo with exhibit mark prefixed pagination at the bottom centre - e.g. JJS-07 - and an identical copy of the photo without the exhibit mark, the copy without the exhibit mark should be omitted

Exhibit frontsheets should not appear in this section, just the individual photographs themselves. The reason for this is that Exhibits often contain more than one photo - and even if  they appear (as they generally should) within the Exhibit in chronological order, there will be other photos to be included in the Photographs section whose dates are later than the earliest document in the Exhibit but earlier than the latest document in the Exhibit, so that if the whole Exhibit were to be inserted in the Photographs section it would mean that the section would no longer be chronological, which it should be. 
 
Other Documentary Evidence. This is often the largest part of the Trial Bundle and consists of documents which came into existence in the ordinary course of events in the past such as letters, purchase orders, invoices, written agreements, emails etc. which tend to prove or disprove a party’s case on an issue in dispute, usually arranged chronologically within a single section regardless of the document type, whether contract, purchase order, invoice, letter, email etc. so that the historical sequence of events can be appreciated. Occasionally it may be appropriate to have some separate sections if, for example, the case requires a complete collection of bank statements over a number of years, or a large number of title deeds for a particular property. 

Within this section duplication should be avoided so if, for example, two identical copies of a letter written from one party to another have been previously disclosed (one copy disclosed by each party) only one copy should be included in this section (unless they are different - e.g. with one containing a significant annotation). 

Exhibit frontsheets should not appear in this section, just the individual documents themselves. The reason for this is that Exhibits often contain more than one document - e.g. selected emails and letters - and even if  they appear (as they generally should) within the Exhibit in chronological order, there will be other documents to be included in the Other Documentary Evidence section whose dates are later than the earliest document in the Exhibit but earlier than the latest document in the Exhibit, so that if the whole Exhibit were to be inserted in the Other Documentary Evidence section it would mean that the section would no longer be chronological, which it should be. 

Expert Reports. Reports by experts such as (depending what the case is about) engineers, surveyors, or surgeons.            

All Exhibits. This section contains all Exhibits referred to in any of the above witness statements.

Most of the time it should not be necessary to refer to this section because a copy of every document contained in an Exhibit should be either in the Photographs section (if it is a photograph) or in the Other Documentary Evidence section, and it should be possible to tell, when looking at a witness statement which refers to a non-photograph document, which document is being referred to without actually looking at the Exhibit itself. For example if the witness statement says I wrote to him on 4 July 2017 pointing this out but in his reply letter dated 17 September 2017 he refused to do anything about it. I refer to a this correspondence marked Exhibit JJS4 then the two letters dated 4 July 2017 and 17 September 2017 can be found by date in the Other Documentary Evidence section without actually having to look at Exhibit JJS4 in the All Exhibits section. 

Also if a photograph in the Photographs section has exhibit mark prefixed pagination at the bottom centre - e.g. JJS1-07 - and a witness statement says I refer to the photo of the garden which I took on 22 June 2017 marked JJS1-07 it is not necessary to consult the All Exhibits section in order to establish what photograph is being referred to.         

However occasionally it may be necessary to refer to the All Exhibits section if there is any doubt as to what document is being referred to in a witness statement which refers to exhibits.

The All Exhibits section normally appears as the last section of the Trial Bundle and it is good practice to add a note to the title of the All Exhibits section saying Note: copies of all documents in the following Exhibits are in the chronological sections above so that someone using the Trial Bundle is aware that the All Exhibits section only needs to be consulted if there is any doubt which document is being referred to in a witness statement. To reduce (ideally to zero) the number of times it is necessary to consult the All Exhibits section the court/tribunal rules/guidance might require all references to documents in witness statements to be marked (in the right hand margin of the witness statement) with a link to the page of each letter, email, photo etc. within the chronological Photographs and Other Documents sections (see for example Chancery Guide paragraph 21.39). In some cases it might even be agreed (in writing) by the parties that, because the links are accurate and so comprehensive, the All Exhibits section can be completely omitted from the Trial Bundle but if that step is taken, a separate bundle containing the All Exhibits section should be available if needed at trial.   
 

Below is an example of a Trial Bundle bundle index - the first page of the bundle.



Creating a Trial Bundle PDF

Take the Pleadings, Orders and Witness Statements DCS case, rename it to Complete set of Case Documents for Trial and copy all documents from the My Documentary Evidence and Documentary Evidence Disclosed by Other Side DCS cases into it. 

As explained above, duplication should be avoided within the Other Documentary Evidence section of the Trial Bundle but you should, nevertheless, copy every document from the My Documentary Evidence and Documentary Evidence Disclosed by Other Side DCS cases into the Complete set of Case Documents for Trial DCS case. When you create the Trial Bundle sub-bundle using that case, you can leave documents out of the Trial Bundle (for example if they are duplicates or if neither party requires them to be included) by selectively unticking the Included box in the sub-bundle for those documents not to be included but, because the decision about what documents to include involves collaboration with the other side, and because they may be inefficient and things may run up to the wire, it is useful to have in the Complete set of Case Documents for Trial DCS case every document which the other side might legitimately want to have included in the Trial Bundle. You can initially untick in the sub-bundle those documents you believe are not required but if the other side informs you that they require some to be included you can easily tick them again in the sub-bundle before the final Trial Bundle is generated and distributed. 


Agreeing the content of the Trial Bundle with the other side

The Trial Bundle must contain all evidence which the judge will be asked to consider during the trial. Some people think that they can bring along to the trial lots of other documentary evidence as well but this idea is quite wrong. All documentary evidence must be in the trial bundle. If you discover at the last minute that something has been accidentally missed out of the trial bundle then the court/tribunal might give you special permission to use it but equally it might refuse or there might be a costs penalty so make sure every piece of evidence you want the judge to look at is in the Trial Bundle. 

There are some documents which may be prepared by barristers to supplement their oral argument about the facts or the law which might be loose and not be included in the trial bundle such as Skeleton Arguments, Chronologies, Case Summaries, Lists of Issues, and legal authorities (statutes and decided cases which establish legal precedents). Also any "without prejudice except as to costs" (or "without prejudice", "Calderbank" or "Part 36") offers or responses must not be in the trial bundle because the judge must not see these until after the judge has given judgement (decided who wins). In addition there may be schedules showing the legal costs (e.g. barrister fees and court/tribunal fees) with supporting invoices attached, which a party has incurred and which the judge does not need to consider until, after judgment, a party (usually the winner) applies for a costs order - these may be just stapled or a party may produce a separate Costs Bundle. But none of these documents are evidence for the trial. Any documents which are evidence relied on by a party to prove its case at trial must be in the Trial Bundle.       

The court/tribunal rules, or the court's/tribunal's order, will require the parties to co-operate in the production of the trial bundle. One party (normally the Claimant) has the responsibility for actually producing and delivering the bundle in the required number of copies, but that party should ask the other party, in good time, what documents they wish to be included, and the other party should respond in good time. 

The general rule is that any document which either side wishes to be included in the Trial Bundle should be included, neither side having a veto. However there are some circumstances in which a party may object to the inclusion of a document which the other party wishes to be included. For example "without prejudice except as to costs" offers made by one party, but not accepted by the other, should not be included because the whole purpose of the "without prejudice" offer system, which is sanctioned by the rules, is that parties should be encouraged to make settlement offers without being concerned that the judge hearing the case will see the "without prejudice" offer before the judge has decided who has won. It is unlikely that there will be a dispute about the principle that "without prejudice" offer documents should not be included, but sometimes there can be a dispute about whether a particular document really is a "without prejudice" offer. If there is a genuine dispute of this nature about a document, normally the parties agree not to initially include the disputed document but to take sufficient (hole punched) copies to the trial so that they can be inserted or not depending on the judge's ruling. Therefore any such genuinely disputed document would not be included in the Trial Bundle.  

Another circumstance where a dispute can arise is where a party wishes to include a document which has not previously been "disclosed". Normally court/tribunal directions require the parties, at an early stage in the litigation process, to produce disclosure lists, listing all the documents they will use (or might want to use) at trial, and the rules provide that a party cannot subsequently insist on a document being included in a trial bundle unless it is a document which appears on either party's disclosure list. Permission must be sought from the court/tribunal to include such a document if the other side objects

Generally a trial bundle should only contain relevant documents because large numbers of irrelevant documents waste the court's/tribunal's time. If they other side ask you to include a few documents which you consider irrelevant then they should be included - there is no point querying it if there are only a few and there are no other reasons to object apart from irrelevance. But if the other side ask you to include a large number of documents you think are completely irrelevant it is worth querying with them why they think they are relevant. Your query may prompt them to reconsider. Ultimately if they insist of the documents being included they should be, but if the judge, at the trial, makes a criticism of the fact that a large number of irrelevant documents have been included in the bundle, and requires to know which party was responsible so that an appropriate sanction (such as an adverse costs order) can be made, you will be able to show from the correspondence that they were included at the insistence of the other party. 

If it is logistically impossible for you to include in the Trial Bundle all the documents requested by the other side - e.g. because they have requested, right at the last minute, that a huge number of documents be included -  you may have to decline to do so and then the other party may have to produce their own supplementary bundle, in the required number of copies, to be used by the court/tribunal alongside the main trial bundle. This is, however, very much a second best because documents should be arranged in logical sequence in a trial bundle and having some documents in the main trial bundle and other documents in a supplementary bundle means the sequence of documents may not be as easy to follow. Courts/tribunals expect the parties to co-operate in advance so that no supplementary bundle is needed.

It is important, therefore, that you, the bundle-producing party, should send to the other party, in good time before the trial at which the Trial Bundle will be used, a draft copy of the Trial Bundle PDF so that the contents can be agreed. 

Because the Trial Bundle PDF will be large special methods are needed to send it by email.  

You could produce, as a first step, a Trial Bundle containing only the documents you require in the bundle (by unticking the Included box for all other documents within the sub-bundle) and invite the other party to specify what further documents they require to be included (which can then be ticked within the sub-bundle). However usually you will have a good idea what documents the other party is likely to require (every document specifically referred to in the statements of the other side’s witnesses will be needed, for example) and it is easier, logistically, to initially include in the Trial Bundle sub-bundle all the documents you require plus all the documents you think the other party is likely to require, and the other party can then be requested to confirm whether there are any further documents they require to be included  (if there is a large run of documents which you have included only because of an assumption that the other party is likely to require them, then you can, at the same time, ask the other party to confirm that they do indeed require them).

Because, at the outset, you copied into the Complete set of Case Documents for Trial DCS case all the documents from the Documents Disclosed by Other Side DCS case, if the other side asks for a document to be included, and when you look for the document (in the Complete set of Case Documents for Trial DCS case) to tick the Included box for the Trial Bundle sub-bundle you find that the document is not there, this, on the face of it, means that the document the other side wish to include has never been disclosed and so they are not entitled to have it included but, before you get back to them saying this, double check your records to make sure that you have not made a mistake (e.g. by omitting to load into the Documents Disclosed by Other Side DCS case a document which was actually on their disclosure list).  

As you are responsible for producing the Trial Bundle you need to make a plan with deadlines for

1. When you will be sending the first draft of the Trial Bundle, in PDF form, to the other side.

2. When the other side need to get back to you with a request for any further documents to be added

3. When you will send the Trial Bundle in it final form in hardcop to the other side.

The court/tribunal may have given directions specifying the deadlines for 1, 2 and 3, but often the court/tribunal will only specify the deadline for 3 and leave the parties to agree the logistics of agreeing the Trial Bundle and the deadlines for 1 and 2. To the extent that the court/tribunal has not set deadlines for the process of producing the Trial Bundle, you, if you are the party responsible for producing the Trial Bundle, need to plan the deadlines. The court/tribunal expects the parties to co-operate so you should show some flexibility but you need to take the lead in (politely) proposing deadlines and not letting matters slide. So, for example, 8 weeks before the date of the trial, you could send an email to the other side saying

As the Claimant with primary responsibility for producing the Trial Bundle, I plan to send you a draft in about 2 weeks time, that is to say by [date]. I will be using computer software to produce it so I will be able to send you a complete draft bundle (and not merely an index) in PDF form for your comments/agreement. I would suggest that we set a deadline of 2 weeks later - i.e. [date] for you to get back to me with any request for any further documents (which, of course, can only be documents already disclosed) to be included. I would then plan to provide you with the Trial Bundle in its final form (in both hardcopy and PDF form) not later than two weeks before the start of the trial.   

In this example you should have 2 weeks, after the other side has confirmed what documents they wish to be included, to produce the final bundle which should be more than adequate but giving yourself ample time, in this way, allows you to show some flexibility if the other side ask for a few days grace. 

Once agreement on bundle contents is reached, the final trial bundle can be produced. It is vitally important that everyone - the judge, the parties, and their barristers - have identical copies of the bundle with identically numbered pages, and that it is this final trial bundle's page numbers which are used by barristers when, for example, making notes and skeleton arguments in preparation for the trial, so, to avoid any confusion, it is good practice, when initially making available to the other side the draft bundle in PDF form, to emphasise that it is a draft and that the page numbers of documents in the final bundle will be, or may be, different. 


If the other side will not co-operate

If you plan ahead and make contact with the other side in good time, the process of agreeing what should be in the Trial Bundle should be relatively smooth, but if the other side delay telling you which documents they wish to see included in the Other Documentary Evidence section you may be faced with a dilemma. You do not want to wait forever and risk not allowing yourself sufficient time to produce and deliver copies of the trial bundle on time, but, on the other hand, you do not want to be criticised by the court/tribunal, later on, for showing insufficient flexibility resulting in inconvenience at the trial if the other side ends up having to produce its own supplementary bundle containing documents you have omitted.  

If you are in this situation the first thing to do is to count up how many extra pages of documents there are not so far included in the Other Documentary Evidence section of the bundle which the other side could, theoretically, ask to be included. Look at each document which does not have, in the sub-bundle, the Included box ticked and check whether or not it is a duplicate of another document which already has the Included box ticked. Add up the number of pages of all unticked documents which are not duplicates. This is the maximum number of extra pages which the other side could theoretically ask to be included. If this number is a small proportion - say less than 10% -  of the total number of pages already included in the bundle you might decide to take the initiative and add to the bundle all the extra documents which the other side could possibly ask you to include because, at the end of the day, the court/tribunal would probably prefer having a single bundle containing a limited number of unnecessary documents, but with all documents in order, rather than having the possibility of being presented with a late-produced supplementary bundle in addition to the main bundle. Of course having even 10% extra unnecessary pages is not ideal and you should make sure that you have a paper trail of correspondence, which you can, if necessary, show to the court/tribunal demonstrating that you only took the step of including the extra documents because the other side's repeated failure to engage in time risked an unacceptable delay in the production of copies of the trial bundle.

 

Printing out, assembling and dispatching the Trial Bundle

First - plan the arrangement of sections within volumes

Although it is referred to as "a bundle", the Trial Bundle may, of course, consist of a number of lever arch files/ring binders if necessary because of the number of pages in it and because there may be some pages larger than A4 size which require a separate larger binder. In fact, even if the bundle is less than 300 A4 pages in total, and so could physically be accommodated in a single volume, it is still generally desirable that more than one volume should be used so that the Witness Statements section is not in the same volume as the Photos and Other Documentary Evidence. This is so that when a witness is giving evidence, and a page from their witness statement is open, the documents they are being asked questions about will be in another volume and everyone can have both pages open simultaneously. 

For example the sections of a Trial Bundle could be arranged in lever arch files and ring binders like this:

Volume 1 (A4 lever arch file)
Index (7 sheets - A4)
Section A - Pleadings (41 sheets - A4)
Section B - Orders (9 sheets - A4)
Section C - Notices about Evidence (2 sheets - A4)
Section D - Witness statements (90 sheets - A4)

Volume 2 (A4 lever arch file)
Section E - Photographs (30 sheets - A4)
Section F - Other Documentary Evidence (210 sheets - A4 and a few A3 sheets folded to A4 size)

Volume 3 (A3 ring binder)
Section G - A3 Maps (10 sheets)
Section H - Expert Reports which contain A4, A3 and some A2 pages (43 sheets)

Volume 4 (A4 ring binder)
Section I - All Exhibits (50 sheets - A4)


Note that volumes are given numbers rather than letters - e.g. volume 1, volume 2 etc. (rather than volume A, volume B etc.) This is to avoid confusion with the sections which are given letters - section A, section B, etc.


Doing the printing and assembling

1. Click the Download Complete Bundle button as shown below to download the Trial Bundle as a PDF. 



2. If you have a suitable fast colour printer which can print double-sided you might choose to print out the Trial Bundle PDF on your own printer or, alternatively, you might use a high street print shop to do this for you. Print the PDF in these steps

a.) First of all, print the Front Page. This is the title page which contains the name and number of the case and the title of the bundle (e.g. "Trial Bundle") in tramlines and is intended to be on the outside of the front cover of each volume. It has to be printed separately (when printing double sided) to ensure that the underside of the printed sheet is blank. Print as many copies of the Front Page as there are volumes. 

b.) Print the Index pages. A copy of the Index pages should be inserted at the front of every volume so print as many copies as there are volumes.

c.) Print every section separately (to ensure that the first page of each section is on a new sheet of paper). If a section contains any A3 (or larger) pages, print them on the correct size paper single-sided before printing the remaining A4 pages double-sided. All pages must be printed in colour: this is not only because some pages may contain photographs or colour-coded plans but because the page number on every page is in red and red printed in greyscale can be difficult to see.    


3. When the bundle pages have been printed out, hole punch them and file them in one or more lever arch file/ring binders. If a section contains any A3 (or larger) pages either fold them or use a larger binder for them. As explained above witness statements should always be in a separate volume from the Photos and Other Documentary Evidence (so that a page of a witness statement, and a document referred to on that page, can be open simultaneously).  

4. For each volume, write the number of the volume (in large writing - 72 point), a brief indication of the contents of the volume (in medium writing), and the name and number of the case (in small writing) on a label affixed to the outside spine. For example:

3

MAPS and EXPERT REPORTS

 Smith v Jones

Case No PT-2018-123456

 

           


5. A label with the volume number and brief indication of contents should be stuck 
on to the front inside cover of each volume at the top left - i.e. it should be more than a page's width from the retaining prongs/rings so that it can be seen even when the pages of the volume are open: 

3

MAPS and EXPERT REPORTS

 



6. After the Front Page has been fixed on the outside of the front of each volume, use a black pen to mark in large lettering in a prominent position on the Front Page the number of the volume and a brief indication of contents:

VOL 3

MAPS and EXPERT REPORTS




7. If a volume contains more than one section then you should insert a cardboard tab at the front of each section. For example if the third volume contains two sections Section G - Maps and Section H - Expert Reports, the label on the volume should say Vol 3 Maps and Expert Reports, and a cardboard tab with G - Maps written on it should be inserted before the maps, and a cardboard tab with H - Expert Reports written on it should be inserted before the expert reports.

8. Repeat steps 2 to 7 above to produce several identical copies of the bundle. Unless the court/tribunal rules or specific directions given by the court/tribunal, require more, you generally need two copies for the court/tribunal (one for the judge and one for the witness box) one copy for the other side (if the other side need two hard copies - one for them and one for their barrister - they can print the second hard copy from the PDF copy of the bundle which you will also be sending to them) one copy for your barrister and one copy for you.


Sending out the hardcopy bundle copies

1. The court's/tribunal's order will specify a deadline by which you must deliver the trial bundle in hardcopy form to the other side in advance of the trial and generally you will be sending copies of the bundle to the other side by post. The deadline for delivering the court's/tribunal's copies to the court/tribunal office depends on the particular rules and any specific directions given by the court/tribunal. Many offices have limited storage space and consequently the directions may specify a maximum as well as a minimum time for delivery to the office - e.g. "The Claimant shall lodge the trial bundle not more than 14 days before, and not less than 7 days before, the trial date". Usually, again because of lack of storage space, the directions will require only one copy of the bundle to be lodged in advance at the court/tribunal office with the second copy (for the use of witnesses) being brought along on the first day of the trial. 

2. When sending copies of the bundle by post, you should enclose a covering letter (saying e.g. "Please find enclosed one copy of the Trial Bundle...") giving the name and number of the case and the date of the trial). Ensure that the lever arch files/ring binders are well padded so that the metal retaining prongs of the lever arch file, or metal rings of the ring binder, are not bent during handling in the post. Once a retaining prong or ring is bent out of position, it is impossible to bend it back into exactly the right position so that the prongs/rings close tightly together, with the annoying result that every time the judge using the file turns over a page, the page catches on the point where the retaining prongs or rings (almost) join.
 

Providing PDF copies of the Trial Bundle

You should, as well as providing the Trial Bundle in hardcopy form to the court/tribunal office, also provide the Trial Bundle PDF on a USB stick. The USB stick should be a brand new USB stick which has not been used before and if the Trial Bundle contains placeholders for any video or audio files, the video/audio files themselves (e.g. the mp3 or mp4 files) should be loaded to the USB drive in addition to the Trial Bundle PDF. Generally the USB stick should be in a hole-punched pocket (secured in such a way that it cannot fall out accidentally) at the front on the first volume of the hardcopy Trial Bundle. 

See here for how to provide a copy of the Trial Bundle PDF to the other side.


Inserting new documents into a Trial Bundle after it has been sent out

You should take great care to ensure that the bundle is correct and complete before copies are sent out. If, despite best endeavours, you discover, after some or all of the copies of the bundle have been sent out, that a document has been missed out, it is essential that steps are taken to insert the additional document(s) in the same position in all copies of the bundle, including those already sent out, because the copies of the bundle used by the judge and by the parties and their barristers must be absolutely identical. It is also essential that the new documents are page-numbered in a way which does not disturb the existing page numbering of the bundle. See here for how to do this using CaseLines DCS subnumbering.

DCS subnumbering can only be set at the document level so if you have a situation where just one or two pages of a document have been missed out (not the whole document) you will first need to remove the document with missing pages, replacing it with a blank as described below, before inserting a copy of the complete document containing all pages.

If a document needs to be removed, how to remove it cleanly, without altering the page numbers of other documents, is explained here.


Disclaimer

This information page is designed to be used only by clients of John Antell who have entered into an agreement for the provision of legal services. The information in it is necessarily of a general nature and is intended to be used only in conjunction with specific advice to the individual client about the individual case. This information page should not be used by, or relied on, by anyone else.

The information on this page about specific computer techniques is provided for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information is accurate and up to date at the time it was written but no responsibility for its accuracy, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by me. Any sample screen layouts are based on the version of software current when the screen shot was taken and may be different now. You should satisfy yourself, before using any of the techniques, software or services described, that the techniques are appropriate for your purposes and that the software or service is reliable.


This page was lasted updated in April 2018. Disclaimer